@larissaarcher I just generally favor people, communities over buildings, aesthetics. Although I do appreciate architecture.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler besides, there are communities who could much better served by his population influx than SF, which is only suffering.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher like who? It's difficult everywhere to add population, even in Detroit.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Detroit could use it more than we could. Point is that SF should not have to shoulder this burden. It has the most to lose...12 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher@kimmaicutler Michigan here; very interested in hearing proposals for transferring SF's housing demand to our cities.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @murphmonkey
@murphmonkey can't tell of that's snark. How would you feel a out more tech company HQs in your cities. That's what we're talking about.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher and I don't see build-only sol'ns as the answer, whether in SF or in Ann Arbor. But "go to Detroit" isn't much answer either.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @murphmonkey
@murphmonkey but "don't pile on SF" might be the start. .1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher and "don't focus all development impact on small, character-defining neighborhoods" probably good in either state.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @murphmonkey
@murphmonkey@kimmaicutler this is the s*** we're having to deal with from density-promoters, btw: https://www.facebook.com/housingrightsSF/photos/gm.868147613306508/10153201292630303/?type=3&theater … terrifying.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@larissaarcher @murphmonkey over 20 years.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.