@kimmaicutler Detroit could use it more than we could. Point is that SF should not have to shoulder this burden. It has the most to lose...
-
-
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher it's also totally judgmental to think that other places could "use it more than we could"2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler it's not an unreasonable judgement. There are areas that could use some more industry, more money, more population.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher more POC without them actually thinking through the consequences of that statement1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler again, not a reason for SF to accept being the primary repository for an entire industry, which it has become. ..3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@kimmaicutler and the NIMBY jibe is out of place too. SF DOES have a unique culture, history and aesthetic. Wanting that respected....1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@kimmaicutler should not be dismissed as trivial or narrow-minded. It's taking into account that there is. More to consider than...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@kimmaicutler just how many units can one pile on top of each other in this generic square footage of space.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @larissaarcher
@larissaarcher SF doesn't do that and will never do that. We have one of the most participatory development processes, if not the most, in1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler but the "build, build, build" brigade disparages and wants to do away with that. It's not set in stone.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@larissaarcher bc the process arguably does more to hurt than help at certain points. Like CU for 100% affordable housing
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.