@kimmaicutler The entire state will be built out within a few decades b/c millions of people want to move to CA to retire or for better life
-
-
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 "built out" is subjective. Built out w environmentally inefficient sprawl is diff than doing coastal infill w decent transit1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler 1)There's no $$ for transit since gov pensions are taking more $$ from gov budgets. 2)You assume everyone wants what you want4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Wish you were born 30 yrs earlier? World pop went from 3.5B to >7B. If .1% have $ and want to live in CA the rest of us suffer2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 or CA didn't have to choose such terrible land-use, taxation policies1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@RFrances2 what is so different with CA's land-use and taxation polices then say, TX? NY? WA?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_sorci_
@kimmaicutler@RFrances2 CA has highest personal tax rate in the nation, No? Without counting prop taxes1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_sorci_
@Sorci3@kimmaicutler NY is high too but CA is far ahead of most states.CA uses FMV for prop tax; most states use much lower assessed values1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2@kimmaicutler so even more taxes are the solution to low home ownership?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@Sorci3 @RFrances2 well I mean, a more fundamental question is what is the right level of home ownership rate? Clearly, we couldn't get it
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.