@RFrances2 but it makes residential development revenue negative for many CA cities
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Then why is Central Valley, Inland Empire, NE SD, Sacto to Yuba one new subdivision after another? CA land is being chewed up1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 bc were not doing multi family infill in the Bay Area? All those are SF tracts.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler The entire state will be built out within a few decades b/c millions of people want to move to CA to retire or for better life1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 "built out" is subjective. Built out w environmentally inefficient sprawl is diff than doing coastal infill w decent transit1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler 1)There's no $$ for transit since gov pensions are taking more $$ from gov budgets. 2)You assume everyone wants what you want4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 refuse to build anything at population growth, ride property value $$ gains while capping taxes.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@RFrances2 underinvest in public transit, then blame privileged younger workers for pricing out service workers.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Empathize, but disagree about what to do. 1) Start taxing rent incomes 5-10% if vacancies below 5%. Use $$ to build housing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@kimmaicutler Why can't Silicon Valley uber-smart executives move 1000's of jobs elsewhere? Why are they predating housing in the Bay Area?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@RFrances2 entrepreneurs will still keep coming of their own accord bc potential gains outweigh costs.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.