@RFrances2 but it makes residential development revenue negative for many CA cities
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Then why is Central Valley, Inland Empire, NE SD, Sacto to Yuba one new subdivision after another? CA land is being chewed up1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 bc were not doing multi family infill in the Bay Area? All those are SF tracts.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler The entire state will be built out within a few decades b/c millions of people want to move to CA to retire or for better life1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 "built out" is subjective. Built out w environmentally inefficient sprawl is diff than doing coastal infill w decent transit1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler 1)There's no $$ for transit since gov pensions are taking more $$ from gov budgets. 2)You assume everyone wants what you want4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 refuse to build anything at population growth, ride property value $$ gains while capping taxes.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@RFrances2 underinvest in public transit, then blame privileged younger workers for pricing out service workers.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Empathize, but disagree about what to do. 1) Start taxing rent incomes 5-10% if vacancies below 5%. Use $$ to build housing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@kimmaicutler Why can't Silicon Valley uber-smart executives move 1000's of jobs elsewhere? Why are they predating housing in the Bay Area?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@RFrances2 they do hire elsewhere? All over the world and country. Also, there are 1000s of small firms, it's not as if job growth is up to
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.