@RFrances2 Prop 13 savings just got priced into higher property values, which penalizes future Californians, future middle class.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler This comment seems misguided, which is unlike your usual. Prop 13 has little to do with price of property.When sold P13 resets1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 but it makes residential development revenue negative for many CA cities1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Then why is Central Valley, Inland Empire, NE SD, Sacto to Yuba one new subdivision after another? CA land is being chewed up1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 bc were not doing multi family infill in the Bay Area? All those are SF tracts.4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler The entire state will be built out within a few decades b/c millions of people want to move to CA to retire or for better life1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RFrances2
@RFrances2 "built out" is subjective. Built out w environmentally inefficient sprawl is diff than doing coastal infill w decent transit1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler 1)There's no $$ for transit since gov pensions are taking more $$ from gov budgets. 2)You assume everyone wants what you want4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Wish you were born 30 yrs earlier? World pop went from 3.5B to >7B. If .1% have $ and want to live in CA the rest of us suffer2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@RFrances2 like a Berlinificiation of the Bay Area, rather than a Manhattanization, would be cool.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.