-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@mattocko why? wouldn't the value decrease?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@mattocko perhaps, but wouldn't the incremental density and decrease in views offset?4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@mattocko that wouldn't qualify for the calculation of just compensation. And it is not even likely true in SF.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rabois2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@mattocko I don't see a strong argument that companies would be more valuable in SF if they could hire more local workers.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@rabois@mattocko now their domestic ecosystems are strong, their cities are dense and we'll increasingly compete head to head in consumer1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@rabois @mattocko Ed Glaeser, the Harvard econ prof who wrote "Triumph of the City" authored a paper http://crei.cat/people/ponzetto/Ponzetto_Urban_networks.pdf …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.