Interesting that everyone is tweeting this but if you don't vote or show up on Jan. 28, doesn't really matter!https://twitter.com/paulg/status/681917595985940480 …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler How would you address problem of loss of rent-controlled housing? We are hemmed in by state law, seems major problem to me.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DonaldFalk
@DonaldFalk state law AB 2222 mandates replacement at minimum 1-for-1 http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB2222 …1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler !!!!!!!!!!!! First reference I have seen.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler My biggest concern w dens bon leg was RC, and I don't understand y AB2222 isn't being discussed as solution. Have I missed it?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DonaldFalk
@DonaldFalk AB 2222 is being discussed by planning dept.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@timredmondsf That's exactly what I was reading and not understanding, seems to contradict.9 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@DonaldFalk @timredmondsf This is an est 7K extra units over 20 years on a projected 240 parcels. He's exaggerating the scale of the program
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@DonaldFalk@timredmondsf found the reference to the 240 parcels estimate out of 30,500 eligible http://www.sf-planning.org/ftp/files/plans-and-programs/planning-for-the-city/ahbp/ahbp_memotoCPC_2014-001503PCA.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @noahsloss
@kimmaicutler@DonaldFalk@timredmondsf even so, I don't think it's wrong for RC tenants to be concerned and want protections in the plan4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.