@DarwinBondGraha @kimmaicutler loong discussed pt: ‘Impact fees’ r based on nexus studies written to justify them, not on objective analyses
-
-
Replying to @tmccormick
@tmccormick@kimmaicutler Do you think there's an "objective analysis" underlying the income tax?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DarwinBondGraha
@DarwinBondGraha@kimmaicutler there are many relatively objective analyses we might use to assess what's good policy for desired outcomes.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tmccormick
@DarwinBondGraha@kimmaicutler city-commissioned#nexusstudies are not, imo, among them.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @DarwinBondGraha1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @tmccormick
@DarwinBondGraha@kimmaicutler impact fees are offspring of tax-revolt, anti-dev, exclusionary politics; affordability concerns, not so much1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tmccormick
@tmccormick@kimmaicutler That's a creative reading of the legal/political history.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DarwinBondGraha
@DarwinBondGraha@tmccormick fees & CID (common interest developments) are all offshoots of Prop 13 http://www.amazon.com/Privatopia-Homeowner-Associations-Residential-Government/dp/0300066384 …2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@tmccormick Of course they are, but Tim's making it sound like fees are nefarious mechanisms of cynical cities.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DarwinBondGraha @tmccormick more like desperation with the lack of revenue sources.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.