@kimmaicutler I think that's because, typically, the criticism isn't worded as eloquently and comes out as snarky trolling.
-
-
Replying to @DShankar
JJ 「cιtιƶεɳƒιvε」 🏴☠️ Retweeted JJ 「cιtιƶεɳƒιvε」 🏴☠️
@DShankar Very diplomatic of you. I mince less words here, as I'm frustrated af. https://twitter.com/ctzn5/status/671898926102896641 …@kimmaicutlerJJ 「cιtιƶεɳƒιvε」 🏴☠️ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CTZN5
@DShankar I even LIKE +onekade. But that shit was 110% snarky trolling.@kimmaicutler1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CTZN52 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler his 3-tweet snark against Zuck's charity being an LLC therefore invalid (click thru to it)@DShankar3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler I'm a firm consequentialist, so results are all I care about. LLC, 501c, gov, corp... all synonymous labels to me.@DShankar4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@CTZN5@DShankar it's not as if 'government' is a homogenous entity either though; also has a lot of built-in biases etc.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @smc90
@kimmaicutler@CTZN5@DShankar Bottomline: there is room for both approaches. Not either or. Let them both work their own ways.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@smc90@CTZN5 the election cycle is both a critical benefit/hindrance to govt, and a critical benefit/loophole for charities0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@CTZN5@DShankar I wouldn't conflate 'public' with 'transparent' though. Accountability occurs in many forms.0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.