With all due respect for Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan's gift, these are some very good questions to raise.https://twitter.com/johncassidy/status/672232075408375808 …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler I appreciate how@JohnCassidy describes the possible downsides of "philanthrocapitalism" without being one-sided or rude3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DShankar
@kimmaicutler@JohnCassidy tangential questions: will philanthrocapitalism be more effective at healthcare/R&D/education than fed govt?1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @DShankar
@DShankar@kimmaicutler@JohnCassidy Well, depends on their learning iteration, as Zuck's first foray into education was a disaster2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @craig_montuori
@craig_montuori@DShankar@JohnCassidy not because it's a bad gift or it was mal-intended but because we should know about the effectiveness2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@craig_montuori@DShankar@JohnCassidy and we should subject large philanthropy to as much scrutiny as we give to public govt spending1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@craig_montuori@DShankar There is huge movement in philanthropic world to measure impact/outcomes not just donor acctability1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @smc90
@kimmaicutler@craig_montuori@DShankar BTW this is opposite of govt. More accountable to constituents (and funders!) than to outcomes.2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
@smc90 @craig_montuori @DShankar that can also be pt of the problem bc non profits can distort their orgs to attract more capital over
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@smc90@craig_montuori@DShankar thats part of the reason I like the idea of "effective altruism"; but in reality they're nuts0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.