Right to shelter is more important in NYC where homeless people would die from exposure. Not comparable to SF.https://twitter.com/kimmaicutler/status/663519826846068736 …
-
-
Replying to @NinjaEconomics
@NinjaEconomics NYC seems to have at least 10x the population of SF as well: 8.4 million versus 840,0001 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HWecon
@HWecon@NinjaEconomics no but the point is that street homeless is exactly the same. Those ~60K are in hundreds of shelters.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@HWecon Do you think homeless shelters are just as important in California as they are in, say, Alaska?2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NinjaEconomics
@NinjaEconomics@HWecon clearly there is more mortality risk in colder weather, but right to shelter seems like a pretty fundamental right2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@NinjaEconomics@HWecon even more so when you consider how much we spend putting them in jail/hospitals instead.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisFnicholson
@chrisFnicholson@NinjaEconomics@HWecon that's more of a cost efficiency than rights, justice argument but I also agree.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@NinjaEconomics@HWecon well, at a point expensive things can’t be a right due to sheer unaffordability. This, we can do.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@chrisFnicholson @NinjaEconomics @HWecon I mean @BevanDufty was telling me we are in earshot of ending veteran homelessness in SF.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.