@TaupeAvenger @eparillon @kimmaicutler Maybe from Dept of Toll Crossings (1948) expected combined SF-Alameda County 1970 pop of 1,839,500?
-
-
Replying to @enf
@TaupeAvenger@eparillon@kimmaicutler BART planning in 1956 expected SF in 1990 to house between 700K and 1M1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @enf
@enf@TaupeAvenger@eparillon where are all the links to this information?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@TaupeAvenger@eparillon What I happen to have on paper at home. Looks like I didn't even scan BART one. Will take pics now2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @enf
@kimmaicutler@TaupeAvenger@eparillon BART 1956 predictionspic.twitter.com/wOyZTVNmnY
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @enf
@kimmaicutler@TaupeAvenger@eparillon SF 1948 transportation plan predictionspic.twitter.com/c68goSeNGe
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @enf
@kimmaicutler@TaupeAvenger@eparillon This under zoning w/mostly unlimited ht/density exc Sunset & W of Twin Peaks http://trafficways.org/scans/1947-sf-zoning.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @enf
@enf@TaupeAvenger@eparillon wait what does this map mean? Unlimited height and density where?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@TaupeAvenger@eparillon Unlimited density in 2nd Residential (unshaded areas). Unlimited height exc marked 40' and 105' zones2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @enf
@kimmaicutler@TaupeAvenger@eparillon Those 4 pages at the end were the entire text of the planning code1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
@enf @TaupeAvenger @eparillon ok, dutifully tweeted. But I didn't have space for the HT.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.