Shockingly I agree 100% with @timredmondsf and @48hills here: http://www.48hills.org/2015/11/05/another-16000-apple-workers-looking-for-housing/ … Approving 16k Apple workers with nowhere to live.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@timredmondsf@48hills I suspect that's mostly consolidation of people in other offices. Though those will then fill up again2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @timredmondsf
@BenedictEvans@kimmaicutler@48hills We are not Nimbys, we just believe in planning. As in: Build housing for your workers, where they are5 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @timredmondsf
@BenedictEvans@kimmaicutler@48hills I believe in building housing for the workforce. Most SF workers aren't in tech, need affordable hsg2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @timredmondsf
@BenedictEvans@kimmaicutler@48hills I think: Don't approve new tech offices without a plan to house workers. Simple.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @timredmondsf
@timredmondsf@BenedictEvans@kimmaicutler@48hills Why just tech? Should it be, discourage all new jobs until we have enough housing?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@RedwoodGirl @timredmondsf @BenedictEvans @48hills yeaaaaaaaah, that plan would backfire.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@timredmondsf@BenedictEvans@48hills Well, yeah, probably. :) But just bringing it up would make people get how bad it is.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.