@kimmaicutler @mjb_sf 2) If a person buys a 2nd home, and doesn't rent it, seems like it would also destroy value by that rationale.
-
-
Replying to @adamnash1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@mjb_sf Thx for your patience. Always interesting to dive a bit deeper into these topics.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@mjb_sf I don't think it is off, just seems like comparing aggregate economic impact to revenue is a mismatch.4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@adamnash@MJB_SF analysis flawed b/c based on outlier cost case#490SVanNess, assumes all units BMR & 100% subsidy not IZ.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tmccormick
@tmccormick@adamnash@MJB_SF IZ units still cost mostly the same as market-rate. It just comes out of the developer, project.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@adamnash@MJB_SF yes but quite different than saying it "costs the city" that amount. City needs to just permit more units.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tmccormick
@tmccormick@adamnash@MJB_SF it's not just a question of permitting more period. It's where. What share market rate, affordable.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@tmccormick @adamnash @MJB_SF Outer Sunset is freaking over 1,000 units over 20 yrs.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@adamnash@MJB_SF of course when you introduce new housing plans for 1st time in decades, ppl show up at mtgs & protest.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tmccormick
@kimmaicutler@adamnash@MJB_SF there are many aves to sell W side on housing. Much of Sunset eg could clearly be improved by development.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.