Many Latino community leaders I've talked to are OK w/ a lot more density (if they can get 2,400+ affordable units)https://twitter.com/garrytan/status/660204990342938625 …
-
-
Replying to @eparillon
@eparillon well, the Mission will just keep blocking more construction and keep making it more painful for everyone.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@eparillon everyone except the people who can afford to buy at market rate1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dgouldin
@dgouldin@eparillon which is becoming a more and more elite sliver of people.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@eparillon but those are the exact people Prop I supporters are fighting against, no? I just don't get it.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dgouldin
@dgouldin@eparillon in the meantime, use moratorium to pressure, extract more from the city govt for affordable housing in the neighborhood1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@eparillon sounds like negotiation with terrorists, lots of collateral damage in the meantime6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dgouldin
@dgouldin@eparillon inclusionary has produced 1,787 units in SF since 1992. http://www.citylab.com/housing/2015/04/how-urban-planners-see-americas-growing-housing-affordability-crisis/391167/ …1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@eparillon that sounds more like a condemnation of our overall rate of building than of inclusionary to me1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@dgouldin @eparillon it's both.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.