@dgouldin @eparillon which is becoming a more and more elite sliver of people.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@eparillon but those are the exact people Prop I supporters are fighting against, no? I just don't get it.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dgouldin
@dgouldin@eparillon crowd them out, drive the land values down, so an attempt can be made w/ non-profit developers.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@dgouldin@eparillon if they were actually effective at driving land values down the land owners would sue3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @khuey_
@kimmaicutler@dgouldin@eparillon to get 2400 via 20% affordable we'd need 12000 market rate units.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @khuey_
@khuey_@dgouldin@eparillon I have tried to point this out before.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@dgouldin@eparillon that means they'd have to roughly double the number of homes in the neighborhood. This *is* doable.5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @khuey_
@khuey_@dgouldin@eparillon if they want that % to be higher & hold developers accountable, how do they create something legally2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@dgouldin@eparillon go back to the ballot. This is what we should be voting on. Not this prop I bullshit.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @khuey_
@kimmaicutler@dgouldin@eparillon the fundamental ? is if they're ok with a community that has the same absolute # of Latinos but smaller %4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@khuey_ @dgouldin @eparillon you can always ask them directly @gabrielmedina5
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.