@kimmaicutler @ZKunst uh, no. separating office buildings from each other is the opposite of aggregation seen in cities
-
-
Replying to @asaxena1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@ZKunst city cores have high-rise residential. when Apple needs to expand further, low-rise housing will get in the way2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @asaxena1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@ZKunst so Apple employees driving to meetings during the day is better than them transiting in 1x/day from residential areas?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @asaxena
@kimmaicutler@ZKunst transit works much better in hub-and-spoke model than in point-to-point which is haphazard1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @asaxena1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@ZKunst yes that's the point-- interspersing housing will decentralize. the opposite needs to happen for transit to work well6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@ZKunst no, putting the jobs near each other is *centralizing*, which appears to be what you are opposed to4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.