@jessedhillon @chamath demonstrate understanding of what?
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@chamath both inequality and the technology industry.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler I didn't think it was a strong piece. For one, the idea that software was pure and now is gaining tangible impact is IMO wrong5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jessedhillon
@jessedhillon also, chamath contacted me about this at 8 pm the night before, so I don't know what I could have done to do an in-depth etc1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler :) It's not a personal critique, and you're making a fine tarte from my bitter lemons. This convo needs more than 140 chars.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler I already agree with the premise. My point is that the world was not just today taken over by affluent WASPs.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jessedhillon
@jessedhillon it required a conversation and constant pushing for change to happen. It didn't just passively or magically occur.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler I think we're converging on this: an effective conversation has to have a historical context.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@jessedhillon OK, what the f have I been doing all year long? http://techcrunch.com/2015/01/10/east-of-palo-altos-eden/ …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler so the original tweet was "I don't think *this* was well written," not "I think this author sucks"0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.