@kimmaicutler Do you actually endorse this tactic?
-
-
Replying to @kevinmonty
@kevinmonty if we do not densify within the region's boundaries, pressure goes toward greenfield land on the exurban periphery.2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Sierra Club isn’t the right target.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kevinmonty
@kimmaicutler Ruining its leadership won’t spur development just like blocking shuttles won’t make housing affordable2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @kevinmonty
@TaupeAvenger@kimmaicutler probably wasting my time, but highly recommend binging or yahooing what sierra club does http://www.sierraclub.org/programs5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kevinmonty
@kevinmonty@TaupeAvenger@kimmaicutler the SF chapter which routinely trades on the sierra club name is the NIMBY force here1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @suldrew
@suldrew@TaupeAvenger@kimmaicutler How can you even pretend we “can’t build”? http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2015/09/the-55000-units-of-housing-in-san-franciscos-development-pipeline.html … + most office construction in 30+ yr4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@kevinmonty @suldrew @TaupeAvenger most employed residents in history. 10-20k added per year. Again, would prefer that South Bay do its part
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TaupeAvenger
@TaupeAvenger@kimmaicutler@kevinmonty@suldrew Can we have a Twitter summit where we decide what "South Bay" means?4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes - 3 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.