@kimmaicutler The renderings for Uber's HQ were beautiful, but the bird deaths would have prevented it from being in SF, right?
-
-
-
@dcurtis not really. One building is never enough. - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@kimmaicutler will there even be one? maybe something announced tmrrw, but would be kind of weird for a standard lease. not a tax break -
@coryweinberg yeah but Uber + Oakland is super political, no matter which way you cut it. - 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@MattPasienski@SovernNation@LibbySchaaf w city economist's report yes. But more overall city tax revenues is only one small piece.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MattPasienski@SovernNation@LibbySchaaf it's all very complicated. More jobs? But for whom? And who got priced out?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MattPasienski@SovernNation@LibbySchaaf not the argument. Do the good jobs, "better" neighborhoods include the ppl who are already there?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MattPasienski@SovernNation@LibbySchaaf and why were the neighborhoods not "better" in the first place? What policies created them?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MattRosoff were tax incentives even necessary in the first place? I mean, at the time and ~10% unemployment, I could see why it was argued.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MattRosoff but in retrospect, maybe they probably would have stayed anyway.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.