@FitzTheReporter @markasaurus it's not the developer's responsibility to offer tenant protections, it's the city's.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@markasaurus sure, but the developers are the ones in a position to politically pressure the city1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FitzTheReporter
@FitzTheReporter@markasaurus for tenants rights? Developers usually sell the project off to some other entity that manages it3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@markasaurus ...they wouldn't present strong opposition. That'd all I'm saying.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FitzTheReporter
@FitzTheReporter@kimmaicutler@markasaurus First of all, SF already has the strongest tenant protections in the country, so it's unclear...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarketUrbanism
@MarketUrbanism@kimmaicutler@markasaurus ckearly, as our mass exodus of San Franciscans shows, those protections aren't enough.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FitzTheReporter
@FitzTheReporter@kimmaicutler@markasaurus Yes, but is there *anything* that would be enough in a supply-constrained environment?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarketUrbanism
@MarketUrbanism@kimmaicutler@markasaurus That's not the answer. Politicians routinely craft laws to address situations which seem dire.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FitzTheReporter
@FitzTheReporter@kimmaicutler@markasaurus So what's your tenant protection solution? Repeal Ellis Act, rent control single-fam dwellings?4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MarketUrbanism
@MarketUrbanism@FitzTheReporter@kimmaicutler an agency that helps people find new housing/assistance would help1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
@markasaurus @MarketUrbanism @FitzTheReporter might actually have a tech *gasp* solution for this that we can talk abt tomorrow
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.