@kimmaicutler @tmccormick @jspidersf Agree, it's an improvement over the status quo, just inadequate to the huge affordability problem.
-
-
Replying to @hanlonbt
@hanlonbt@tmccormick@JspiderSF land prices are exceedingly high while federal & state funds are AWOL.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@hanlonbt@JspiderSF SF has many public sites; & is one of wealthiest & most prospering places in US.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tmccormick
@kimmaicutler@hanlonbt@JspiderSF given SF wealth, I tend to think the fault is not in our stars; or lack of regional govt or fed/CA funds.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tmccormick
@tmccormick@hanlonbt@JspiderSF uh, that's the discussion we're having this November. Is there political will to fund it locally?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@tmccormick@hanlonbt@JspiderSF are people willing to spend $56.24 per year to subsidize housing for others?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@tmccormick@hanlonbt@JspiderSF We would need a housing bond of this size every year, in perpetuity, to even make a dent.3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @vjon
@kimmaicutler@tmccormick@hanlonbt@JspiderSF ...so the long question is, are they willing to pay $1.5k/yr to implement systemic production2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @vjon
@vjon@tmccormick@hanlonbt@JspiderSF you have a seniority-based tax system w/ caps that incentivizes just sitting on land for appreciation4 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@vjon@hanlonbt@JspiderSF strongly seniority-based tenancy also, b/c rent control, on only older bldgs, & vacancy decontrol4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
@tmccormick @vjon @hanlonbt @JspiderSF they go hand in hand. Was passed in response to the tax piece.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.