Are San Franciscans selfless enough to back a bond for $370/resident to build housing that 99.9% of them won't get? http://www.afr.com/news/world/north-america/san-francisco-issues-bond-for-low-cost-housing-as-tech-sector-push-rents-sky-high-20150810-givq2i …
-
-
Replying to @MarketUrbanism
@MarketUrbanism I agree with the goal, but not the method. How about relaxing zoning and building hurdles so that there is enough housing?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AnastasiaNov
@AnastasiaNov@MarketUrbanism inclusionary has built <1,800 units in SF since 1992. It doesn't actually produce that much housing2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@MarketUrbanism we haven't really built too much since 1992 with the exception of recent years3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnastasiaNov
@AnastasiaNov@MarketUrbanism you're effectively taxing (thus economically inhibiting) new development to pay for affordable housing.3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@MarketUrbanism yeah, maybe we are better off not having the inclusionary requirement because it's yet another hurdle2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@AnastasiaNov @MarketUrbanism and bc projects can still pencil w inclusionary, unlike in other areas like Oakland.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.