The voting public hates new construction while it simultaneously demands more affordable housing. It doesn't add up.http://granolashotgun.com/2015/06/15/affordable-housing-minus-the-housing-and-affordable-parts/ …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler I don't think it's true voting public demands more affordable housing. Markets reveal preferences2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler uhhhhh, I'm sure many would love to pay $0, as would I. People are free to make their choices in the marketplace2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@asaxena if Palo Alto land was actually governed by the pure market, it might be a bunch of skyscrapers by now3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler or the skyscrapers would exist in places like Alabama or Mississippi where the markets are freer and surely zoning is freer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.