Net loss of $250-300K every time a unit is removed from housing stock for short-term rentals http://sfcontroller.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=6457 … https://twitter.com/emilymbadger/status/620699825168781313 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Net loss to whom, and how? To the city via lost resident living/working there?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@vgr $650K seems waaaay too high when you can buy new 3K sqft house elsewhere for half that.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NickPinkston
@NickPinkston@vgr but that 3K house is not near entirely new industries being created on a semi-annual basis.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@vgr Rephrase? I'm not parsing your tweet.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NickPinkston
@NickPinkston@vgr I said that 3K sq ft house isn't adjacent to the jobs/companies being created on a semi-annual basis in SF/Silicon Valley1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@vgr Yea, that's a land issue, but higher buildings spread that cost. Is contractor supply here artificially constrained?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NickPinkston
@NickPinkston@vgr becoming a political issue now as we exhaust the available unionized construction labor supply http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/real-estate/2015/06/mission-housing-opposed-by-unions-sf-development.html …2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
@NickPinkston @vgr some contractors apparently flying in out-of-state workers w/ current construction volume.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.