Building affordable housing in good school districts with robust transit is a better policy than the hours worked/redistribution debate.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler Unless you nationalize housing/zoning decisions I don't see how it gets fixed for precisely this reason.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @conorsen
@conorsen@kimmaicutler split the difference with deep federal subsidies / financing tied to the affordable housing. Might work. Maybe.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davealevine
@davealevine@conorsen it's not the cost that prevents them from taking affordable housing. It's basic classism and racism.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@conorsen yeah. But developers are capitalists and might fight that battle to make money. That's why I said "maybe".3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davealevine
@davealevine@conorsen homeowners, who get 20%+ YOY returns in the Bay Area for doing nothing, are celebrated.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@conorsen doesn't make much sense. As your article pointed out months back, taxes and other things are the issue in Cali3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@davealevine @conorsen it's layer upon layer, local, state, federal. UK has the same problem.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@conorsen when you bail out the system and boost prices without reform or thought about distribution things get ugly.0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.