If SF is going to pay $257k per door to buy land for housing, I'd better redo the math http://www.spur.org/publications/article/2014-02-11/real-costs-building-housing …https://twitter.com/SFBTCory/status/618853262079467520 …
-
-
Replying to @markasaurus
@markasaurus@kimmaicutler Do you think they're just being optimistic Mark? Or rounding down?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SFHAC
@SFHAC@markasaurus why not make it taller and make it 150 units?3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@SFHAC@markasaurus they moratorium folk want 3,000 affordable units.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @woolie_archives
@woolie@SFHAC@markasaurus it's the babyboomers that care about shadows. Millennials love density.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@woolie@sfhac@markasaurus I heard a lot about shadows from the Plaza 16 protestors at the "monster in the mission" meeting1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dgouldin
@dgouldin@woolie@SFHAC@markasaurus shadows on the school? If that building was affordable, would they have complained?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@woolie@sfhac@markasaurus if affordability was their complaint, they shouldn't have been talking about shadows.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@dgouldin @woolie @SFHAC @markasaurus if you got subsidized housing, would you be complaining about shadows? No.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.