@kimmaicutler comparing these to vacant units seems arbitrary. 2k out of 214k total units seems fairer.
-
-
-
@tolles if you assume that 1-2% of ttl housing stock is typically available for new perm rentals at any given time, 2K is not insig. - 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@kimmaicutler Only reason this seems "deep" is because SF refuses to build. 1-2K units would be nothing if 15k+ units were being built. -
@DanKeshet if you think we under-supply residential, we absolutely under-supply hotel. That's partly why hotels aren't visibly opp to Airbnb - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@JspiderSF yeah, I understand.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ben_mathes@Dr_Memory Magical Urbanism.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@kimmaicutler@MarketUrbanism But by that logic, every hotel that exists is an unjust removal of housing. Or every plot of land w/o a house. -
@JanetheActuary@MarketUrbanism no, because those hotels are explicitly zoned from inception to be hotels.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@kimmaicutler so… .05 to .10% of the total rental stock then? QUICK WE NEED A MORATORIUM. -
.
@Dr_Memory Yes, seems intellectually inconsistent to rail against Airbnb for reducing supply while pushing a housing moratorium. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.