It looks like there will be a ballot initiative in Nov. to halt market-rate housing development in the Mission. http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/real-estate/2015/05/mission-housing-moratorium-november-ballot-sf.html?page=all …
-
-
Replying to @LoganDobson
@LoganDobson@kimmaicutler@coryweinberg Not in Econ101. Econ347 says un-regulated developers build@highest price points, drive prices up.6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PlazaSixteen
@PlazaSixteen if you want 100% affordable, where does that money come from?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler 100% on new developments great start until reach balance city targeting. Where did $100mill come from for Twitter et al?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PlazaSixteen
@PlazaSixteen what $100M? VCs have a fiduciary obligation to their LPs to earn a return, have a model that looks for 10X returns.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler media sources totaled tax breaks to Twitter and others at $100mill at the time.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PlazaSixteen
@PlazaSixteen the city economist argues that it made money on the Mid-Market tax exclusion. http://sfcontroller.org/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=5914 …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler that may be true. Even more reason for 2020 plan etc to find ways to capture boom money & apply it to affordable housing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@PlazaSixteen why not $250M affordable housing bond on ballot this Nov.?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.