@MBridegam @eparillon Do you really want to have that entirely separate conversation on Twitter?
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@eparillon I wanted to question whether Google's plan to build housing suitable for its own lower-paid staff is egalitarian.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MBridegam
@MBridegam@eparillon I have no idea who the housing is supposed to be allocated for. If it's part of a CBA, I assume Mtn View would handle2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@eparillon The fiction of meritocracy is pretty relevant here but the trend toward self-containment is more interesting.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MBridegam
@MBridegam@eparillon you don't seem to have a good alternative solution though.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@eparillon I'm thinking about how campus/company-town ideas are evolving. The jobs-housing imbalance is a bigger subject.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MBridegam
@MBridegam@eparillon Obviously it would be ideal if the city, region could handle housing production at multiple income tiers instead1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler why is housing characterized by income tiers, rathr than cost levels? We don't speak of, say, low-income bicycles or computers1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tmccormick
@kimmaicutler we might instead aim for availability of housing supply at widest possible range of prices, not presume what people should pay1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tmccormick
@tmccormick@kimmaicutler Best: enough housing subsidies, managed respectfully, that tenants are no longer viewed as unfortunates. They=us.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MBridegam @tmccormick see acceptance of Section 8.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.