@andyblue415 They offered 49 BMR and 41 "middle-income" units, double the normal % developers offer under city regs.
-
-
-
@andyblue415 maybe your demands of developers will make more logical sense.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@andyblue415 Mission's resistance focused on evictions while Tenderloin's strategy in 70s, 80s was more aggressive about land acquisition
-
@andyblue415 when you can convince property owners in the Mission to sell their land for < 350K per buildable unit http://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/Mission-District-development-sites-prices-shoot-5546231.php …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@andyblue415 It feels like people don't want any construction there period, which is against basic transit-oriented dev. policies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@andyblue415 that neighborhood is most rapidly gentrifying, unlike other neighborhoods bc
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@andyblue415
@suldrew You mean the Ohlone? Or the Missionaries? Or the Irish?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@andyblue415
@suldrew there is *no one* living on that plot of land. There is a Walgreens, a Burger King and a local Asian grocery market.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@andyblue415
@suldrew doing nothing means people moving in with more cash will compete with current residents for pre-existing units.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@andyblue415
@suldrew doing almost nothing to match housing prod. w/ population growth is basically what SF has done for decades.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.