@balajis I moderated that panel. This is what was written in response: http://48hillsonline.org/2015/02/08/new-pro-growth-group-takes-politics-housing/ …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@balajis So the counterargument is that demand is ~infinite? Wouldn't prices quickly be approaching infinity then, too?6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart@balajis that nuance gets totally lost in simple sloganeering1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler@balajis Seems the core disagreement is long-term (market equilibrium) vs. short-term (preventing evictions). Why not do both?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @paulbaumgart
@paulbaumgart you strengthen financial consequences of evictions http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2015/02/payouts-50k-per-eviction-proposed.html … and build housing on available lots.
0 replies
1 retweet
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.