@PeoplePowMedia No worries. I'm running around too.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler yes. we need to be finding billions not millions for aff. hsng. Gov allowing IFDs helps. Next step 4 us is to work on #'s4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PeoplePowMedia
@PeoplePowMedia what it needed at the time. But by the 20th century, it started enacted growth controls, air rights system, etc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler different times. we were looking at an ny times report based on recent data. not trying to compare to the tenement days2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeoplePowMedia
@PeoplePowMedia the point is that they also enacted a ton of growth controls like SF. Their building up happened a long, long time ago.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler ok-- so what is the point then? buildings in manhattan should be taller still? if we're embracing a for-profit housing model2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeoplePowMedia
@PeoplePowMedia You might. Or you'd upzone other parts of the other four boroughs, which is what De Blasio is doing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler there's certainly demand at all income levels. different strategies are needed for different levels of ability to pay.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PeoplePowMedia
@PeoplePowMedia Would need an integrated regional strategy, possibly change state Constitution to enforce tax sharing if certain communities1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler
@kimmaicutler yes! like plan bay area was supposed to be. integrated regional strategy can be very powerful. tax sharing = very interesting!5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@PeoplePowMedia you wouldn't want sf to be exclusively one economic class of people, and yet the $ would go farther in oakland
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.