Isn’t that way now?
-
-
-
Is it quantitatively? I associate it with mostly office....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Most of the office buildings South of Market are too wide for easy conversion into housing; however, most of the older ones north of Market are about right.
-
Would love if you could elaborate on this point a bit?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
yes please, let's revive this ghost town
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I always wondered why they don’t just convert 6x6 to housing. Maybe not the best location, but it’s a massive waste of space right now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ban the one way streets and it would be pretty great
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean, that whole Twitter building, 6x6, Barney’s, Forever 21 - there’s plenty of space for it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or, how about converting many offices (e.g. those under construction) at
#SouthSanFrancisco's Oyster Point into waterfront homes? Let it become a lively, walkable, mixed-use neighborhood, instead of dull single-use offices, with long shuttle bus commutes to SF apartments.pic.twitter.com/N0vnMGT8ri
-
"the decision to segregate biotech jobs from residential neighborhoods in the Oyster Point Plan 'was an ’80’s planning document' that came at a time when the life-science field was in its infancy & there was a lot of misunderstanding" re R&D health risks".https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/South-SF-s-Oyster-Point-wrong-place-for-12382240.php …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
