Don't forget James v. Valtierra (1971), which upheld Article 34 in the California Constitutionhttps://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/402/137/ …
-
-
-
James v. Valtierra did not involve race.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And it’s important to remember that these rulings “protecting” the suburbs are *explicitly* what Nixon wanted when he appointed 4 of the 5 justices who made those rulings.
-
Along with Buckley, my three least favorite decisions (Dred Scott, Plessey, Korematsu etc are supposedly dead letters). They all argue that inequality is either acceptable or not worth it to address.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I teach both cases to students; they lay at the core of contemporary racial inequities.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.