I never proposed fewer jobs in the city. I wanted to balance job growth with housing growth. That’s sustainable growth. That meant limiting our annual increase in office growth. Not such a radical idea, something San Francisco tried to do a while ago.
-
-
-
Could’ve built housing. But instead you voted for $5.4 million homes on a site that would’ve otherwise had lots of senior affordable housing units!pic.twitter.com/Tk1HofSkyZ
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
At this point, I want the most egregious NIMBYs to dominate Palo Alto politics, so the rest of the state finally decides to disincorporate them
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
living in the same city you work in is UNAMERICAN
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lol, Yimby economic manifest destiny rears its head again. May be time to go back to Greta and disabuse yourselves of “fairytales of eternal economic growth.” (Policies to take speculation out of housing would be a good start).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.