Winners & losers from today's WFH announcement:
Bay Area renters
Startups that want a presence in the Bay
Parents/mid-career (esp. moms!) that want WFH
POC that want to work from diverse cities
Budgets of second-tier US cities
Property owners in Santa Cruz, Napa, etc
-
-
Knowledge workers who can't immigrate to America because of dumb immigration policies and now instead can WFH from other countries & international cities.Show this thread -
Startups that were hiring remote now have a hell of a lot more recruiting competition. (ht @kylemathews)Show this thread -
Congressional political clout of Big and growth-stage tech as they may actually represent a meaningful number of jobs across many districts instead of cordoning themselves off in Khanna, Pelosi and Speier’s districts.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My grandma in Pittsburgh has been complaining about ex-Californians driving up home prices in her Pittsburgh neighborhood for the last 3 years ... fortunately Pittsburgh has been good about actually building apartments
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm a Portland renter. I guess I gotta move to SF to be a winner. SGTM! Back to the Nexus I go!pic.twitter.com/T6QO0eo3dU
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you don't think that this will hasten the already happening rush from the bay to Austin?
-
That's exactly what she's saying. Austin rents will get bid up, so Austin renters will be "losers".
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Long-term career trajectory of the employees who choose to work remote vs. the ones who choose to stay in the office