Winners & losers from today's WFH announcement:
Bay Area renters
Startups that want a presence in the Bay
Parents/mid-career (esp. moms!) that want WFH
POC that want to work from diverse cities
Budgets of second-tier US cities
Property owners in Santa Cruz, Napa, etc
-
-
Property owners in second-tier US cities that have strong amenities for familiesShow this thread -
Employee retention (due to cost of living) for businesses and non-profits that aren't tech
$$ and political will for public transit
Long-term career trajectory of the employees who choose to work remote vs. the ones who choose to stay in the officeShow this thread -
Aggregate climate emissions as workers make fewer daily commutes but presumably fly more for corporate "on-sites"Show this thread -
Bay Area NIMBYs who hate density but presumably may need to rely on ever-increasing home equity to retire comfortably.Show this thread -
-
Denver, Austin, Pittsburgh, Portland, etc. rentersShow this thread -
Knowledge workers who can't immigrate to America because of dumb immigration policies and now instead can WFH from other countries & international cities.Show this thread -
Startups that were hiring remote now have a hell of a lot more recruiting competition. (ht @kylemathews)Show this thread -
Congressional political clout of Big and growth-stage tech as they may actually represent a meaningful number of jobs across many districts instead of cordoning themselves off in Khanna, Pelosi and Speier’s districts.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yeah you missed non-POC who would prefer to live elsewhere
- 9 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.