idk COVID-19 isn't infecting less people bc of a coverage model. aren't we tracking death rates at hospitals where people, regardless of coverage type or lack thereof, are being treated? number of tests / beds / ventilators available is a separate (more important) question imo.
-
-
-
If huge parts of our population (minorities, underinsured) don't trust going to healthcare system because they don't think it will either listen to them or worry it will provide them with a paralyzingly expensive bill, they will go too late and infect more people along the way.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is a logical fallacy :). But.. FWIW I do support universal healthcare and UBI
-
It wasn't necessarily a subtweet about *you* -- maybe a collection of a whole bunch of people who have melded into each other over the last week or two. :)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It sounds like you’d really love to be the one establishing the rules on what can and cannot be said.

-
yes, because my tweets are incredibly serious and not facetious at all.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
this is pretty valid point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Excellent point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd like to retweet this twice
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also the “no lockdown” ignores the fact that they are still self-imposing tons of social distancing measures!
-
I believe they’re isolating the vulnerable, so it’s a semi-lockdown.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.