Although this is obviously stupid and hilarious, I am legit curious about what the equivalent mpg would be accounting for the fact that one probably does eat a bit more when biking frequently. It's gotta be hundreds if not thousands of miles per gallon, right?
-
-
-
Then you’d have to include individual health benefits (reduction in use of medicine, dr visits in a car et al) and a reduction in general alternative transport options which would have generated more pollution. It’s stupid at that point. A cobweb of what ifs.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
at least we're not having water fluoridation fights
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's a double entendre, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
