So how will the focus on streamlining the permit process help with the housing shortage?https://twitter.com/kimmaicutler/status/1217923245514477568 …
-
-
Replying to @AKGsf
The streamlining measure was aimed at 100% affordable projects, not these mega-projects which are different and have confounding factors like being Navy sites, etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @AKGsf
But also, SF is literally probably the only major city in the U.S. where anyone has a right in the city charter to spend $600 and stall anything in appeals for months.https://www.kalw.org/post/special-power-lets-san-franciscans-halt-new-construction-new-law-may-rein …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @AKGsf
this is why
@sfplanning's staff gets stalled in reviewing 5X as many as NYC's planning dept.https://www.planetizen.com/node/81148/crises-and-innovation-converge-san-francisco-planning-director-john-rahaims-watch …2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @sfplanning
SFPlanning should focus regionally on systemic supply issues and obstacles, and not obsess on single permits here and there; not on local petty politics but on regional visionary politics. It should tailor the SB50 regional transportation and housing vision to make it work for SF
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The purpose of that measure was to fix a process impediment that adds months or years to project timelines. And w current version of SB50 they’ll have a few years to offer a local vision before it becomes effective.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.