-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I doubt very much that the developer or their insurers haven't looked at sea level rise projections. I'm tired of "can't build housing here, sea level rise, fire area, bad air quality, quake zone, fill in the blank" arguments.
-
Matt can I interest you in some Miami beachfront property. It must be safe, everyone's building there
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
We can design adaptive housing that “lives w high water” - just like the Dutch, but prepared for earthquakes. There’s no reason not to build - it just has to be built right. Including providing habitat, and cleaning runoff.
-
How does that square with preserving marshland that absorbs/buffers sea level rise and provides defensibility to the rest of the already built land? cc
@ChristinaToms - 19 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
yeah usually when actual environmentalists get involved in an individual project they are correct
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At this point...eh, I'll take it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
a rare housing development that
@eb4everyone sent in a letter of *opposition* forThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
NYC could be underwater too. Not sure your approach works
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At least the habitats of the wildlife will be destroyed by pavement before they even get a chance to drown in the rising Bay
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.