Build dense housing on climate defensible land, people.https://twitter.com/susie_c/status/1187099211486990336 …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
This sets up a big fight over what land is climate defensible, no? Is it defensible if it costs $1B to build a wall?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
I think what we’re heading towards is never really building rules to decide what is/isn’t and instead it’s decided by political access (see how rich communities get better access to FEMA funds)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler
The insurance companies deciding does not seem a politically palatable situation even if it’s where we are heading
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hassankhan
No but that is where we’re heading and eventually voters and taxpayers will be asked if they want to subsidize other Californians living in high risk areas.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Either the insurance companies keep dropping people or FAIR is expanded. And then the liability that PG&E bears is more clearly and directly shifted to the state.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
yes this is hard.