It’s pathetic, considering how much his predecessor bluntly talked (and made policy) about the realities of climate change.
-
-
one would hope and expect that a different approach to governance would reduce that risk significantly.
-
Maybe, but that might also include the reality that the political system doesn’t want to consider — that maybe huge parts of the state are unviable to live in long-term.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
But couldn't we choose to properly maintain the lines so there wouldn't be potential $30B liabilities?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You could nationalize Cal Fire at the same time and just have the treasury pay for firefighting efforts, it's not inflationary spending
-
This isn't the kind of thing where you want to let artificial fiscal constraints paint your perception of what's possible
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.