This is problematic given SF's greater need for new housing (and larger population size!), but remember that Oakland actually has a larger land area (56 sq mi) than San Francisco (47 sq mi).https://twitter.com/SarRavani/status/1160946726951239681 …
-
-
Yeah good point. I still think this has more to do w more “easy” vacant lots than taxes tbh. Oakland taxes are a bit higher than SF’s and EBMUD charges a lot. My sense is that we are seeing banked land and entitlements finally become housing bc rents have risen quickly
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
) than SF. The mitigation costs are both substantial in terms of veg mgmt and undergrounding and then politically complicated — what do w the massive fuel load just sitting there every fall in EBPRD.