If you looked at the underlying cost of producing one affordable unit in SF -- $750K/unit with 5+ years of process -- 200-250K/unit that has to be raised at the local level (and up to $350-500K/unit if it's middle income)...
-
-
right. There is a vast jobs-housing imbalance. Everyone agrees about that. Tim Redmond agrees with it. You have different ideas about what an equitable and effective solution would be. And Quentin Kopp isn’t a Republican.
-
that jobs-housing imbalance is inextricably financially tied to a lot of NIMBY behavior throughout California. Cities don't make enough property tax revenue from residential and they can no longer use retail/shopping centers to offset it. So they now do office,
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That plan enabled the city to claim a 33% affordability threshold, but again, if those numbers are based on a 4:1 jobs-housing ratio, what do you think that means for the rest of the city's housing stock? And, what if the Westside and the rest of the city does nothing (again)?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.