(Again, the Board of Supervisors, the city’s legislative body, leans anti-housing, while the mayor is pro-housing.)
-
-
Show this thread
-
I think this is a fairer assessment but I hope
@RafaelMandelman watches his leg so it doesn’t do the opposite of what he intended it to do:https://twitter.com/bobakkabob37/status/1157352152160849920?s=21 …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“There goes the neighborhood!” — 70 yo Hessie Harris of
#MoCoMD. Pretty sure I’ve stood in line next to this person at my neighborhood supermarket.
-
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
voting for
#NIMBY@RafaelMandelman was the biggest mistake I’ve made voting in#SF. Never again.@sfbike should adopt#NoNIMBY endorsement policy. Density is good for cycling. -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What’s adding to the dysfunction is that many folks double down on nimby when their home is their sole retirement plan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But SF is meeting their very weak RHNA goals that don’t account for historic underbuilding, low vacancy rates and overcrowding!!!!
-
Or their massive jobs growth.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Ugh! this is incredibly frustrating. When local elected officials do stuff like this, they are simply inviting more legislative action from Sacramento. We are not going to give up the fight more more
#ADU in California! -
I’m all in with this approach as well!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
