It’s absurd that SF spends so much time arguing over the allocation of the ~2,000 we units we build a year while owners of the existing ~400K housing units generally see their assets appreciate by $130 *billion* a year. https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/real-estate/2016/01/san-francisco-home-values-zillow.html …https://twitter.com/emilymbadger/status/1155817124541206528 …
-
-
Because the existing non-reassessed residential lands of Bay Area cities can't financially sustain public services, cities generally try to cover the financial gap by approving uses of land that produce a net tax revenue bump like office.
-
I agree and completely get the end ideal; the question is about how you keep the transition period from spinning out of control. Reassess, and you rich-shift the demographics of several districts overnight. (Well, within two tax years.) Then that's the city you're working with.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.