that's ridiculous. If you're like everything's the problem and therefore nothing's the problem, you're not fixing anything.
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @natogreen and
In no way does anyone who’s pushing the charter amendment believe it’s “make or break” at all. It’s a self imposed hurdle that came about because the federal government made it illegal to simply say “we don’t want the poors in our neighborhood” why can’t we just get rid of it?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @sammymoss425 @kimmaicutler and
I get it. I don’t care about DR. I’m just suggesting that if we are going to propose policy, we should have evidence that is not anecdotal about why it’s necessary, or at least not tell people to STFU if they are skeptical about the lack of data.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @natogreen @sammymoss425 and
If you add all the anecdotal info- dont you get data?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JanetClyde @natogreen and
I said people who cry for only Local Control but say we don’t need to get rid of DR because of the state mandated SB35 are the ones who should STFU. And again, it’s soul crushing work sometimes ensure our projects don’t get DRd in the first place. What data can I provide on that?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sammymoss425 @JanetClyde and
I’d like to see a BLA audit of your the condition of your soul.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @natogreen @JanetClyde and
Look all I’m saying is Discretionary Review is the grandchild of Redlining and I want to live in a world where we don’t have things like that anymore. I say tear the god damn mural down and burn it.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @sammymoss425 @natogreen and
does anyone know how it even got into the charter in the first place?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kimmaicutler @sammymoss425 and
DR in the charter goes back to 1954 and reaffirmed by city attorney in 1979. Some interesting background reading. There have been a few tries at DR reform. But the weaponized rhetoric around it, rather than a measured and focused policy convo, has blown it up every time.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @pcohensf @sammymoss425 and
what was the history of how it got in in 1954?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
ah it was a motel in the Sunset District from @hunterrible's history: https://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/demolishing-the-california-dream/ …
-
-
Replying to @kimmaicutler @pcohensf and
Pretty disturbing that people in 1978 fully knew poorer people would be forced out to preserve neighborhood character- but it prob didnt really weigh on anyones conscience as long as affordable suburban towns were right next door.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.